Batis 18mm Lens vs Sony 16-35mm Lens
I switched lenses! Yep, I sure did! So ultimately why did I choose the Batis?
Weight Savings (saved about a half a pound)
Wider Aperture (f2.8)
Cheaper (saved about $1100)
As you all know I do a bit of adventuring where I have alot of weight on my back. During the summer days you can find me on road trips, hiking long trails, or backpacking. I love being outside and being out in the high country is where I get some of my best landscape images.
Ever since I started getting into astro photography, I wanted to get a wide angle lens with a wider aperture than what the Sony 16-35 mm has. The Sony is an F4 and I wanted to get an F2.8. So the research began.
The Sony 16-35mm F2.8 came out and man it is drool worthy; however, it is expensive coming in at $2100+ and a heavy pig. Then there is the Batis 18mm F2.8. This one comes in at about $1400 plus it is significantly lighter than both Sony lenses. See specs below.
One day I was in my local camera shop and there just so happened to be a Batis in the used gear section. Hmm.... do I buy a used lens? So I asked about the history of the lens and it just so happened that this lens was like brand new. The guy started out with... "well, funny story". You always know you are in for a treat when that is the very first comment. This lens was bought and returned within a few months due to its size hahaha! So, I was basically going to get a new lens for a used price..... SOLD!
Filter ThreadFront: 77 mm
Dimensions (DxL)Approx: 3.94 x 3.15"
Weight: 11.64 oz
Filter ThreadFront: 82 mm
Dimensions (DxL)Approx.: 3.48 x 4.79"
Weight: 1 lb 8 oz
Filter ThreadFront: 72 mm
Dimensions (DxL)Approx. 3.07 x 3.88"
Weight: 1lb 2oz
So that is it! I am excited to begin sharing images that come from this lens, and am equally excited for how light my entire set up is! Yay!
What lens is your favorite? Leave a comment below. I would love to chat!
Wishing you a beautiful day!
P.S. Did you love this post? Want to see more photography tips and tricks? Check this out here: